Sunscreen Ban Leaves Companies Feeling the Burn

opinions_courtney_sunscreen_tinker air force.JPG

PC: Tinker Air Force

Courtney Cordoza
Staff Writer 

In a landmark decision, Hawaii has become the first state to ban brands of sunscreen that contain the harmful chemicals oxybenzone and octinoxate.

The ruling is an effort to protect coral reefs, which are highly susceptible to damage from the chemicals. Governor David Ige signed the bill this week. All of the outlawed sunscreens will completely be off shelves by January 1, 2021.

This piece of legislation has been met with praise by environmentally-conscious shoppers. Society is beginning to make strides to reduce our carbon footprint on the planet and this is a step in the right direction.

The word ban can come off as harsh but in this case, it is favored. Coral reefs are vital to the marine and human ecosystems.  They protect sea life, are used in medicine and provide jobs. As you can see, the reefs provide so many benefits to life on land and sea. Without them, species of sea life would cease to exist. People who work with the coral reefs would lose their jobs. Coral reefs give us so much that it is only right for us to do our part and conserve them.

Although many are in favor of this new legislation, Big Sunscreen is in opposition to it. The Hawaii Medical Association, Chamber of Commerce Hawaii and the Personal Care Products Council are also against this new bill. They believe that this bill will limit the consumers’ choices in purchasing their preferred sun protection. They also argued that this will reverse the efforts made by the Food and Drug Administration to lower the risk of contracting skin cancer.

Sunscreen companies argue that banning oxybenzone and octinoxate is a risky and foolish decision. The Consumer Healthcare Products Association claims that these chemicals are most important when it comes to skin care prevention. Without it, the sunscreen would be ineffective. Coppertone, Banana Boat and Neutrogena are a few big brands that contain these chemicals and are hurt from the ban.

Are these companies just making these claims because their products will be off the shelves within the next three years? All these companies seem to care about is turning a profit, since other more natural brands are capable of using ingredients that are nontoxic to the coral reefs.

Sunscreen is used to protect the skin from harmful UVA and UVB rays. Prolonged exposure to the rays can cause melanoma, skin cancer that if left untreated can be deadly. It is important that people of all ages and skin colors wear sunscreen with an SPF of 15 or higher. Skin is the largest and most delicate organ on the human body. It is the body’s barrier and should be treated with care. We are more than capable of keeping our skin protected while ensuring the well-being of coral reefs.

These companies are being selfish by putting their own profit before the planet. Sustainability has become a hot topic in recent times. With climate change and plastic waste being a huge issue, we do not need to add any more fuel to the fire. Hawaii banning the dangerous sunscreens is a huge step. Hopefully, this declaration will encourage other states and countries to follow suit.

The chemicals directly impact the symbiotic relationship between algae and the coral reefs. To protect itself, the coral larva places itself in its own skeleton. As a result, they sink to the bottom of the ocean and die. Once the current coral reefs die out, there will be no upcoming generation to replace it. The chemicals in the sunscreen lower their durability to protect themselves from climate change. Before this bill was passed, other ecologists weighed in on the side effects of toxic chemicals in the sunscreen. The test results showed how damaging they were to our waters.

Humans seem to have a pattern of how they react to environmental problems. They do not work to conserve what we already have, opting instead to take charge when major damage has been good. Hawaii is a model example of how states should be treating environmental issues, and it’s time for other states to do the same. It is a great start and only leaves me with hope for the future.

Categories: Opinions, Uncategorized

3 replies

  1. Unfortunately those same chemicals have been found to be more cancerous than the sun can.potentially be. Also the aluminum used in these products is completely toxic to humans but that’s not the case if you believe your body doesn’t absorb things that set on the skin. Sunscreen is much more dangerous than one would think. It’s funny that the medical assosiation would endorse a cancerous product oh wait. Levothyroxine causes cancer most stantins lead to cancer or chemo which causes cancer definitely anybody ever read the side effects on chemo pills leukemia. The reality is we have been duped for years as a human experiment while those with receive more and those without die and.or live tortured lives. Man is supposed to live in harmony with nature not be it’s master nor be it’s Savior and those things that kill nature something we are a part of what effect do you think it has on your body. Wake up.


  2. “They do not work to conserve what we already have, opting instead to take charge when major damage has been good.”

    You mean “done”?

    Man has waited far too long to do anything about the damage being done by plastic. Entire States (Texas, for one) do no recycling whatsoever.

    Our oceans are littered with plastic garbage.


  3. After decades of sunscreen being sold as skin cancer protection, there is zero benefit in regards to skin cancer rates. Perhaps the suncreen that reduces damage just hasn’t been developed. Sunscreen’s claim to reducing premature “aging” seems based on using extreme exposure as a baseline (sunbathers, surfers etc). Sunscreen probably is just snake oil.

    “If solar radiation is a primary risk factor for malignant melanoma, it is reasonable to conclude that reducing sun exposure via topical sunscreen use would be associated with reduced disease risk. However, the available epidemiological data are contradictory. In fact, the majority of studies suggest that sunscreen use is associated with an increased melanoma risk [5-8]. ”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: