New Bill Proposed to Allow Teachers Access to Guns

Shayna Prace
Staff Writer

PC: Wikimedia Commons

A new Act has been proposed that would allow North Carolina teachers to carry guns in schools. Some state lawmakers think that there is a chance of it being approved this year. The School Security Act of 2019 was filed, and would boost the salaries of teachers who went through specialized police training to carry firearms on public school campuses.

This same bill was filed last year, but did not get approved. Senator Jerry Tillman, one of the new sponsors of Senate Bill 192, says that the current climate changed enough to gain more support.

“This is an idea whose time has come,” said Tillman, a Republican from Randolph County. “With the heightened awareness of the legislature, I believe this bill will see success.” The other two primary sponsors of the bill are Republican senators Ralph Hise and Warren Daniel.

Another bill, the School Self-Defense Act, was filed in the state House. This bill would allow teachers to be armed but would not raise salaries to those who chose to do so. This bill had also been filed last year and was not passed.

Mark Jewell, president of the N.C. Association of Educators, said that the group would continue fighting any efforts to arm teachers.

“It’s a disaster waiting to happen,” said Jewell. “We continue to be opposed to arming our teachers with firearms. Arm us with the resources we need to teach our kids to be safe.”

This time last year, soon after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, 379 North Carolina teachers were surveyed on whether they feel it’s a bad idea to arm teachers in schools. 78 percent of those who participated said it’s a bad idea. Even if guns were limited to a small number of educators who received specialized training, 69 percent still were opposed to the idea.

Tillman, a retired school administrator, claimed that as new security issues become more prevalent in schools, the interest in arming teachers gets higher.

The School Security Act would offer a five percent salary raise to as many as 3,000 teachers who complete training programs, becoming, “teacher resource officers.” This training and title would allow for the same arrest power on campus as a school resource officer, who is a certified law enforcement officer assigned to work on school campuses.

The bill would provide $9.3 million to cover the costs of training and raises for teachers participating in the 2019-20 school year.

The bill would also allow for confidentiality for the teachers who are armed. Tillman said that this will make shooters think before walking into a classroom not knowing if the teacher they encounter will be armed.

“It’s a big deterrent to somebody going to shoot up a school,” said Tillman. “You need to stop them any way you can.”

Jewell said the answer is more support staff rather than more guns.

“We need to be armed with support specialists—counselors, nurses, school psychologists—all of those trained professionals who meet the social-emotional health of our students needs,” said Jewell.

Although still unsure of whether the bill will be passed, many North Carolina teachers are still against the possibility and dangers of what arming teachers will lead to.



Categories: News

Tags: , , ,

4 replies

  1. Some teachers and administrators have concealed carry permits. At present, they leave their weapons at home (or perhaps they don’t). The point is, you don’t have to arm anyone. The ones who would be affected by this legislation are already armed.

    Imagine, these armed people already have access to your kids every day, just as people like me (I also have a CCW) have access to them at the grocery store or at McDonald’s, or anywhere else on the street. How does the danger become greater merely because they (or I) happen to be on school grounds? We are the same wherever we are. We are not “triggered”, so to speak, by passing through the entrance of a school any more than by passing into a grocery store or our own homes.

    I fail to understand the moral superiority of being a victim. I would rather have some chance than no chance at all. If you don’t agree, I have to wonder what’s wrong with you and why do we allow you to be in charge of our kids? Do you have a death wish?

    I have heard all the arguments about this: the imagined shootouts where innocents are accidentally shot, etc. There are states where guns are allowed on campus by certain adults. If these accidental shootings actually happen, can anyone point me towards one where a student was shot? Surely as often as I’m told this might happen, it ought to be easy to find dozens of documented cases. Does anybody have even one?

    This is not a dumb idea. Continuing to bury one’s head in the sand and thinking this time it’ll be different is where the stupidity lies.

    Like

  2. Evil how often Democrats work hard to make sure victims stay disarmed. I thought they were pro choice, or is that only for a choice that kills unborn babies.

    Like

  3. The primary reasons schools are targeted is that the vast majority are “GUN FREE ZONES”. That’s like putting a sign up saying “Killers welcome. No guns here.” Wake up people. If there may be guns then maybe shooters have to decide if their actions may have a consequence like somebody may shoot back.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. North Carolina GOP Pushing Higher Pay for Armed Teachers - Red Dot Publications

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: